Effects Of Target-Based Training On Passing Accuracy Among U-15 Players At Sejati Academy Serdang Bedagai

Authors

  • Ihsanul Fikri Sekolah Tinggi Olahraga dan Kesehatan Bina Guna, Medan, Indonesia Author
  • Devi Catur Winata Sekolah Tinggi Olahraga dan Kesehatan Bina Guna, Medan, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Target-Based Training; Passing Accuracy; Youth Soccer; U-15 Players; Football Training

Abstract

Background

Problems in study This based on results observation of students seen when Wrong One player given material play and players often Wrong passing the ball and complete ball control not enough control matter This proven when player do easy ball game very confiscated by player against matter This become problems that must be completed because in essence game a football player player must capable control the ball and be able to pass the ball to a clear and precise direction and target . , population from study This as many as 15 people . From the data obtained After  given target data training Normality Test Pretest Accuracy From the accuracy test results data Passing mark The lowest pretest score was 4 and the highest 7 while for post test scores lowest 6 and value highest 10 The average value for the pretest was 5.27 and the average value for the posttest was 7.53, while For mark deviation The standard pretest is 0.95 and the value Deviation The Post Test Standard is 1.18 for Mark Lhitung = 0.1808, Meanwhile Mark LTable with Dk = 15 at the level α=0.05 = 0.220. So that LCount < LTable (0.1808< 0.220 ). Then Mark Lhitung = 0.1997, Meanwhile Mark LTable with Dk = 15 at the level α=0.05 = 0.220. So that LCount < LTable (0.1997< 0.220 ). With This is the data from the Pretest and Posttest results Student Football Passing Accuracy​ Academy True Serdang Bedagai U 15 Year 2025 Normally Distributed .

Objective

For test Homogeneity calculation F count = 1.24 and F table = 4.60 with dk numerator 1 and dk denominator =n-1 =15-1=14 so seen that f count and < f table (1.24 < 4.60) . This show population originate from homogeneous variance , whereas​ For test Hypothesis t count 5.51 and t table 1.76, Next price the consulted with price table at level significant α=0.05 with dk = n-1 (15-1)= 14 then results This show there is significant difference . With​ thus hypothesis alternative (Ha) which reads "There is an influence Exercise using Target against Student passing accuracy Academy True Serdang Bedagai U 15 2025 ”. Meanwhile Target hypothesis test to Accuracy student passing Academy True Serdang Bedagai U 15 Years 2025 t count 5.51 and t table 1.76, Next price the consulted with price table at level significant α=0.05 with dk = n-1 (15-1)= 14 then results This show there is significant difference . With​ thus hypothesis alternative (Ha) which reads "There is an influence Exercise using Target against Student passing accuracy Academy True Serdang Bedagai U 15 2025 ”, accepted .

Method

 

Results

Problems in study This based on results observation of students seen when Wrong One player given material play and players often Wrong passing the ball and complete ball control not enough control matter This proven when player do easy ball game very confiscated by player against matter This become problems that must be completed because in essence game a football player player must capable control the ball and be able to pass the ball to a clear and precise direction and target . , population from study This as many as 15 people . From the data obtained After  given target data practice Normality Test Pretest Accuracy From the accuracy test results data , the passing value The lowest pretest score was 4 and the highest 7 while for post test scores lowest 6 and value highest 10 The average value for the pretest was 5.27 and the average value for the posttest was 7.53, while For mark deviation The standard pretest is 0.95 and the value Deviation The Post Test Standard is 1.18 for Mark Lhitung = 0.1808, Meanwhile Mark LTable with Dk = 15 at the level α=0.05 = 0.220. So that LCount < LTable (0.1808< 0.220 ). Then Mark Lhitung = 0.1997, Meanwhile Mark LTable with Dk = 15 at the level α=0.05 = 0.220. So that LCount < LTable (0.1997< 0.220 ). With This is the data from the Pretest and Posttest results Student Football Passing Accuracy​ Academy True Serdang Bedagai U 15 Year 2025 Normally Distributed .

Conclusion

For test Homogeneity calculation F count = 1.24 and F table = 4.60 with dk numerator 1 and dk denominator =n-1 =15-1=14 so seen that f count and < f table (1.24 < 4.60) . This show population originate from homogeneous variance , whereas​ For test Hypothesis t count 5.51 and t table 1.76, Next price the consulted with price table at level significant α=0.05 with dk = n-1 (15-1)= 14 then results This show there is significant difference . With​ thus hypothesis alternative (Ha) which reads "There is an influence Exercise using Target against Student passing accuracy Academy True Serdang Bedagai U 15 2025 ”. Meanwhile Target hypothesis test against The accuracy of passing t count is 5.51 and t table is 1.76. Next price the consulted with price table at level significant α=0.05 with dk = n-1 (15-1)= 14 then results This show there is significant difference . With​ thus hypothesis alternative (Ha) which reads "There is an influence Exercise using Target against Student passing accuracy Academy True Serdang Bedagai U 15 2025 ”, accepted .

Additional Files

Published

2026-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles